Decision tools
Rental Property Analyzer
NOI, cap rate, cash flow, cash-on-cash return, DSCR, and a year-by-year projection with a real amortization schedule.
Direct answer: enter the purchase, financing, and rental-operating numbers below and this tool calculates the standard metrics investors underwrite with — NOI, cap rate, cash flow, cash-on-cash return, and DSCR — plus a five-metric year-by-year projection that models real loan amortization, not a static payoff.
Purchase & financing
Income & expenses
Projection
With this checked, property value moves with the property’s own income growth (driven by rent growth above) at a constant cap rate, instead of an assumed market appreciation rate. If the cap rate you enter is higher than the deal’s actual going-in cap rate, year-1 appreciation can come out negative — that’s a signal about the price paid, not an error.
Tax considerations (illustrative)
Land value is typically found on a property tax assessment — land is not depreciable, only the building is. Tax rate is optional; leave blank to skip the tax-savings estimate.
Year-1 summary
- $16,831
- NOI (annual)
- 4.8%
- Cap rate
- -$5,926
- Cash flow (annual)
- -6.3%
- Cash-on-cash return
- 0.80x
- DSCR
Tax considerations (illustrative)
- $10,182
- Annual depreciation (27.5-yr straight-line)
- $0
- Potential annual tax savings
- -$5,926
- After-tax cash flow (annual)
This illustrates only the tax value of depreciation — it does not model mortgage-interest deductibility, passive-activity loss limitations, depreciation recapture on sale, or the alternative minimum tax, and it is not a substitute for a projection from your CPA or tax professional.
Return on cash (year 1)
7.7%
Return on cash combines all four ways a rental typically builds wealth — cash flow, the change in property value, principal paydown, and the depreciation tax shield — divided by your total cash invested. The property-value change and paydown are unrealized until you sell or refinance; this is a combined illustration, not a cash-in-hand figure.
- Cash flow
- -$5,926
- Property value +/-
- $10,500
- Loan paydown (principal)
- $2,667
- Depreciation tax savings
- $0
- Total return (year 1)
- $7,240
Year-by-year projection
| Year | Cash flow | After-tax cash flow | Cumulative | Loan balance | Property value | Equity | Total return | Return on cash |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -$5,926 | -$5,926 | -$5,926 | $259,833 | $360,500 | $100,667 | $7,240 | 7.7% |
| 2 | -$5,626 | -$5,626 | -$11,552 | $256,974 | $371,315 | $114,341 | $8,049 | 8.6% |
| 3 | -$5,319 | -$5,319 | -$16,871 | $253,908 | $382,454 | $128,546 | $8,886 | 9.5% |
| 4 | -$5,006 | -$5,006 | -$21,877 | $250,621 | $393,928 | $143,307 | $9,755 | 10.4% |
| 5 | -$4,687 | -$4,687 | -$26,565 | $247,095 | $405,746 | $158,651 | $10,656 | 11.4% |
Stress test (year 1) — adjust concurrently
All three apply together to the “Custom scenario” row below — e.g. a rent cut and a rate increase at the same time.
| Scenario | Cash flow | DSCR |
|---|---|---|
| Base case | -$5,926 | 0.80x |
| Custom scenario | -$13,659 | 0.51x |
Underwrite the property, not the pitch
Run the stress test before you run the comps.
A property that only works at today’s rent, today’s rate, and zero vacancy isn’t a property that works — it’s a bet. Use the stress-test fields to see how the numbers hold up under a less favorable, more realistic scenario.

Methodology
How these metrics are calculated.
- NOI = rental income (less vacancy) minus operating expenses — taxes, insurance, repairs, HOA, and management. NOI deliberately excludes the mortgage payment and the capital-expense reserve, matching standard underwriting practice.
- Cap rate = NOI ÷ purchase price.
- Cash flow= NOI minus the mortgage payment (principal & interest) minus the capital-expense reserve — the real bottom line.
- Cash-on-cash return= annual cash flow ÷ total cash invested (down payment plus closing costs — or just the down payment if you check “finance closing costs,” which rolls them into the loan instead, raising the loan amount and mortgage payment).
- DSCR = NOI ÷ annual mortgage payment — lenders commonly want this at 1.20 or higher.
- Depreciation = (purchase price − land value) ÷ 27.5 — the standard IRS straight-line recovery period for residential rental property. Land is never depreciable, which is why the calculator asks for a land-value percentage separately.
- Potential tax savings = annual depreciation × your entered tax rate — the value of that deduction sheltering an equal amount of income from tax.
- Property value in the year-by-year projection defaults to purchase price growing at your entered flat appreciation rate. Check “value the property using a cap rate” to switch to an income-approach valuation instead — that year’s NOI ÷ your entered valuation cap rate — so the modeled value tracks the property’s own income growth rather than an assumed market appreciation rate. A single cap rate is applied to every year; this does not model cap rates compressing or expanding over your holding period.
- Return on cash= (cash flow + that year’s property value change + that year’s loan principal paydown + the depreciation tax savings) ÷ total cash invested — pre-tax cash flow plus the tax savings as its own line, so the tax benefit is counted once, not twice. This combines the four components investors typically point to as the real sources of return from a rental — not just cash flow — into one number.
The year-by-year projection runs a real month-by-month amortization schedule, so principal paydown compounds — later years pay down more principal than earlier years, the way an actual mortgage works. Rent growth and expense inflation are entered separately, so operating costs don’t have to rise in lockstep with rent. One remaining simplification: depreciation is treated as a constant amount every year of the projection. This is a simplified estimate, not a substitute for a lender’s underwriting or an accountant’s projection.
The tax-savings figure is a narrow illustration of one benefit — depreciation’s tax shield — not a complete tax picture. It does not model mortgage-interest deductibility, passive-activity loss limitations (which can cap or disallow deducting rental losses against other income depending on your situation), depreciation recapture when you eventually sell (part of the benefit is generally repaid at sale), or the alternative minimum tax. Coordinate with a qualified tax professional before relying on this for a real decision.
Return on cash is a combined illustration, not spendable cash. Property value changes and loan paydown build equity, not cash in your account — you would need to sell or refinance to access them, and both involve their own costs and, for property value, no guarantee the market (or the assumed cap rate) holds. This metric answers “how hard is my cash working across all four channels,” not “how much cash will hit my bank account this year” — that narrower question is what cash-on-cash return above already answers.
Worked example (hypothetical)
A $350,000 purchase with 25% down, a 7% rate, a 30-year loan, $6,000 closing costs, $2,200 monthly rent, 6% vacancy, and typical expenses estimates to roughly $16,831 in annual NOI (a 4.8% cap rate) — but after the mortgage payment and a capital-expense reserve, cash flow is roughly -$5,926 (a -6.3% cash-on-cash return, 0.80x DSCR). This example is intentionally a marginal deal, not a rosy one: it illustrates why calculating NOI alone is not enough — a property can look fine on cap rate and still lose money monthly once debt service is included. Change any number above to see how the picture changes.
With 20% of the price allocated to land and a 24% marginal tax rate, annual depreciation on this example is roughly $10,182, for a potential tax savings of roughly $2,444 — bringing after-tax cash flow to roughly -$3,483. Still negative, but meaningfully less negative than the pre-tax figure — exactly the kind of thing a spreadsheet-only cap-rate comparison misses. This is illustrative only, not a market data point or tax advice.
Widening the lens to total return: year one adds roughly $10,500 in appreciation (at 3% annual) and roughly $2,667 in loan principal paydown. Combined with the (pre-tax) cash flow and the tax savings above, that’s a total return of roughly $9,684 on $93,500 of cash invested — a 10.4% return on cash for a deal whose monthly cash flow alone looks like a loss. Neither number is wrong; they answer different questions.
Downside cases
- A DSCR below 1.0 means NOI does not cover the mortgage payment at all — the property loses money before even counting a capital-expense reserve. Check the stress-test table for how sensitive this is to vacancy, rent, and rate changes.
- A high cap rate can mask negative cash flow if leverage (the loan) is aggressive — always check cash flow and DSCR alongside cap rate, never cap rate alone.
- Capital-expense reserves are frequently underestimated — a roof, HVAC system, or major system failure can consume several years of reserve at once.
- If you value the property by cap rate and the entered rate exceeds the deal’s actual going-in cap rate, appreciation and property value can come out lower than the purchase price, even negative in extreme cases — a signal you may be overpaying relative to that valuation assumption, not a calculation error.
National considerations
Property tax rates, insurance costs, and lender DSCR requirements all vary meaningfully by state and by loan program.
Utah considerations
Property tax rates and rent levels vary by Utah county along the Wasatch Front — use local figures rather than a national average where possible.
Author: Todd McClean, Realtor® | Real Estate Investment Strategist, Mountainland Realty, Inc.. Reviewed July 21, 2026. This tool provides general real estate information and is not legal, tax, accounting, lending, securities, commodities, or financial-planning advice.
Real-world example
What Todd Saw in the Property Other Investors Avoided
Situation: A long-time investment-property owner, later in life, who had already built a substantial portfolio concentrated in financial markets and was reconsidering how much of it should stay there.
What was at risk: Relying too heavily on the stock market with a shrinking time horizon to wait through a prolonged recovery
What Todd identified: Other investors saw an old building with dated units. Todd saw that several of the expensive, predictable capital items — the roof, the furnaces, the bathrooms, the flooring — had already been replaced within the previous few years, while the remaining visible deficiencies were easy to identify, estimate, and correct through a controlled improvement plan.
Action taken: Installed air conditioning in all six units
Outcome: Year-one NOI of $72,996 against a $1,250,000 acquisition and improvement basis, with rents increased approximately 19% and annual cash flow after debt service of $39,847.
Next step
Want a property-specific review?
This calculator uses simplified assumptions. A strategy review can pressure-test your specific numbers, financing, and market.